Also think about how rules are the essence of sports, games, and puzzles, even though their purpose is supposed to be fun. Chess rules, say, can trigger a tantrum when I want the “lockdown” to get out of hand, but I find they say I can`t; or when I find your pawn that comes from my side of the board and turns into a lady, a tower, a jumper or a bishop. Similarly, you will find me a football fan who has not gone on a rampage against the offside rule at least once. “I`m 20 years old and I feel more and more limited by the rules. Endless signs telling me to “stand right” on escalators or “skateboarding forbidden” in public places to all the unwritten social rules like waiting I should settle down, buy a house and have a family. Do we really need all these rules, why should I follow them and what would happen if we ignored them all? Will, 28, London Did you know that it is actually illegal to stand in line when you buy tickets for the London Underground?! The urge to overturn stifling, unfair or simply useless rules is entirely justified. But without certain rules – and a certain tendency for us to abide by them – society would quickly slide into pandemonium. In fact, many social scientists would consider our tendency to create, abide by, and apply rules as the foundation of social and economic life. Our relationship with rules seems unique to humans. Of course, many animals behave in a very ritualistic way – for example, the bizarre and complex courtship dances of various species of birds of paradise – but these patterns are wired into their genes and were not invented by previous generations of birds.
And while humans set and maintain rules by punishing rule violations, chimpanzees – our closest relatives – don`t. Chimpanzees can take revenge if their food is stolen, but most importantly, they usually don`t punish food theft – even if the victim is a close relative. Restrictions on the renovation of older buildings can be so strict that no renovation is possible and buildings collapse. Environmental assessments for new forests can be so rigorous that planting trees becomes almost impossible; The regulation of drug research can be so cumbersome that a potentially valuable drug is abandoned. The road to hell is paved not only with good intentions, but also with rules that enforce those good intentions, regardless of the consequences. If you drive your car, be grateful to other drivers for following the law and, for example, don`t text their friends while driving. Be thankful that there are rules and regulations for worker safety equipment, traffic lights, building codes, and environmental protection. Be aware that various government agencies, such as social services and schools, follow the law to protect children and vulnerable adults. And whether you think we should only have a few rules or a whole bunch of laws, take a minute to think about how you think the system you chose would work.
Who would set the rules or laws? How many would there be and what kind of things would it be? Should there be some kind of punishment if you violate it? Should there be rules for the whole world, or only for entire countries, or can each community decide its own rules? But what if your friend had liked to beat people? Or did you think your watch looked better than yours and just took it with you? While your friend thinks these things are fine, you probably wouldn`t agree – and if there weren`t rules, then there would be nothing to stop them from beating you or stealing your stuff. And nothing to make sure they were punished for doing these things. Think of the different communities in which young people find themselves: school, youth centre, friendship groups or gangs, families. Who sets the rules there? And then there is the “slippage of rules”: rules are added and extended again and again, so that our individual freedom is increasingly restricted. Planning constraints, security rules, and risk assessments can accumulate endlessly, extending their scope far beyond any initial intent. Natural law, or moral law, is based on human nature. It is an instinct that shows us what we should and should not do. It is a law of nature that allows us to understand the effect of doing something wrong, and it makes us understand how to be punished if we do something wrong. Thus, an ideal anarchist society would be more communal – power would be distributed and not everything in a central government, and smaller groups of people would make decisions and rules for themselves. There would still be basic agreements about what is right or wrong – it wouldn`t suddenly become acceptable to steal things or murder people – but there would be no real laws. And people would choose to follow these rules instead of being forced to do so. It would be up to each person to take responsibility for their own actions, not a government, to legislate to control people`s actions.
The good news is that the vast majority of people, businesses, businesses and governments follow the law. If they didn`t, our society might not function properly. There would be no laws, rules or regulations concerning the environment, road safety devices or the repair of roads and roads. Sidewalks would not be shoveled and open to the public. Crimes would be committed and there would be no punishment or rehabilitation. Car accidents would occur, probably more often without traffic laws, and a person injured in an accident would have no recourse to receive damages, including payment of medical bills, from the person who caused the accident. Anarchists believe that everyone should be free. But if we have laws and people who govern over us, like the government, then we are not free – the laws control our behavior because we have to follow them.
Society can punish anyone who breaks the law to set an example and give them the opportunity to rectify the situation. It is important to establish human laws for every society and every community. Of course, there has long been an appetite among some people for a less formalized society, a society without government, a world where individual freedom prevails: anarchy. Many norms of everyday life perform exactly the same function as the rules of the game – they tell us what “movements” we can and cannot make. The “please” and “thank you” conventions that seem so boring to young children are indeed arbitrary – but the fact that we have such conventions and perhaps essential that we agree on what they are is part of what makes our social interactions run smoothly. I thought, “What would happen if there were no laws?” What do you think of these ideas? Do you agree that we need at least some rules to manage the coexistence of people, or do you think we could do without them? Do you think people could be trusted to make good decisions if there were only social rules, but no government making and enforcing the appropriate laws? As long as there are governments and laws, there are people who have wondered if things really should be like this. This group of people is called “anarchists,” a name that comes from the Greek word “anarkhos,” which means “without authority,” and they have been around for some time in various forms. Since then, the law has been a necessary term in society.
On the other hand, if we simply look at the term “law,” we will find that the law is a code of control that governs our lives and determines what individuals can and cannot do. According to experts, the law is a kind of set of rules regulated by law enforcement agencies or authorities. A society cannot live alone; It must contain people of different ages and types. And when diversity exists, chaos can certainly take place. If no law is formed in society, different types of social problems such as slavery, hierarchical rules, division and domination are raised. .